AT&T Statement on Incentive
Spectrum Auction Legislation

Posted by: AT&T Blog Team on January 13, 2012 at 10:31 am

AT&T says it would be a disservice to the Nation if the FCC is so adamant about preserving and enhancing its own power that it would risk killing this crucial legislation 

The following may be attributed to Jim Cicconi, AT&T Senior Executive Vice President —External and Legislative Affairs:

“We applaud the chairman’s continuing support for incentive spectrum auction legislation, which is vital to consumers and to our Nation’s economy.  We are troubled, though, that the chairman and some of his staff are now saying that the FCC, and not the United States Congress, should have full power to impose conditions, and to decide which companies are allowed to participate in spectrum auctions and which should not.

“In our experience, anytime a regulatory agency seeks unfettered discretion, that is the best reason Congress should not give it to them.

“The entire principle behind spectrum auctions is to allow free and competitive markets to work, thus ensuring that valuable spectrum goes to the most economically viable uses.  This also provides maximum return to the U.S. Treasury.  For the FCC to assert, in the name of ‘fostering competition’, that it should have final say on which companies can bid on spectrum is for them to engage in picking winners and losers.  That is not the job of the FCC.  When consumers are able to make decisions in a free and competitive market– and wireless is clearly that– the FCC should not be allowed to impose its own will if it doesn’t like the choices those consumers make.

“The FCC should be a neutral arbiter, ensuring fairness and impartially enforcing a system of rules and laws.  It should not be empowered by Congress to advantage some companies and disadvantage others, or to impose its preferences on a free market.  We commend the Congress for advancing spectrum legislation in a way that helps the economy, maximizes revenue for the Treasury, and ensures that consumers– not regulators– decide who wins and loses in the competitive wireless market.  It would be a disservice to the Nation if the FCC is so adamant about preserving and enhancing its own power that it would risk killing this crucial legislation.”

Read More

AT&T Response to FCC Staff Report

Posted by: AT&T Blog Team on December 1, 2011 at 10:25 am

The following may be attributed to Jim Cicconi, AT&T Senior Executive Vice President of External & Legislative Affairs:  

We expected that the AT&T-T-Mobile transaction would receive careful, considered, and fair analysis.   Unfortunately, the preliminary FCC Staff Analysis offers none of that.  The document is so obviously one-sided that any fair-minded person reading it is left with the clear impression that it is an advocacy piece, and not a considered analysis.

In our view, the report raises questions as to whether its authors were predisposed.  The report cherry-picks facts to support its views, and ignores facts that don’t.  Where facts were lacking, the report speculates, with no basis, and then treats its own speculations as if they were fact.  This is clearly not the fair and objective analysis to which any party is entitled, and which we have every right to expect. 

All any company can properly ask when they present a matter to the government is a fair hearing and objective treatment based on factual findings.  The FCC’s report makes clear that neither occurred on our merger, at least within the pages of this report.  This has not been our past experience with the agency, which lets us hope for and expect better in the future.  Here are examples of what we are describing: 

Read More

AT&T on the Wireless Innovation
and Public Safety Act of 2011

Posted by: AT&T Blog Team on November 30, 2011 at 1:30 pm

The following may be attributed to Tim McKone, AT&T Executive Vice President of Federal Relations: 

“We are very encouraged by the tremendous effort by members of the House to put forth comprehensive legislation that will make available more spectrum for mobile broadband services.  We commend Representatives Waxman and Eshoo for their leadership in addressing this critical issue our country faces.  The Wireless Innovation and Public Safety Act of 2011 provides a framework to free up vital spectrum resources while at the same time recognizing the needs of the public safety community.  We look forward to working with Representatives Waxman and Eshoo and their colleagues as it is critical that Congress move quickly to advance spectrum legislation.”

Read More